Money Read the original on Cointelegraph 2 min read 0

Illinois approves new transaction tax on digital assets

Illinois Governor JB Pritzker has officially signed a state budget bill that introduces a 0.2% privilege tax on digital asset transactions for residents. The measure, which takes effect in early 2027, faces significant pushback from the cryptocurrency industry over its unique targeting of blockchain technology. Critics argue the tax creates an unprecedented financial burden that could drive innovation out of the state while failing to apply similar rules to traditional securities.

Illinois approves new transaction tax on digital assets — ілюстрація до новини в рубриці «Фінанси»
Illinois approves new transaction tax on digital assets — ілюстрація до новини в рубриці «Фінанси» · Image source: Cointelegraph

According to Cointelegraph, Illinois Governor JB Pritzker signed a $55.9 billion state budget bill on Tuesday that includes a new 0.2% "privilege tax" on digital asset transactions. The provision applies to all transactions involving residents conducted on registered platforms under the broad category of "digital asset business activity."

Industry pushback and regulatory concerns

The move has sparked immediate opposition from major industry groups, including the Crypto Council for Innovation (CCI). Advocates argue that the tax disproportionately burdens residents who use digital assets without regard to their actual income, gains, or profits. The CCI urged a line-item veto of Article 3 of Senate Bill 3019, claiming the legislation will stifle growth and force established companies to relocate.

Key concerns raised by industry leaders include:

  • The tax singles out blockchain technology without applying similar fees to stocks or bonds.
  • It may drive major firms like Zero Hash, Jump Crypto, Bitnomial, and Apex Crypto out of the state.
  • Out-of-state companies with significant Illinois customer activity could also face new compliance burdens.
  • The timing conflicts with ongoing federal efforts to establish a national tax framework for crypto assets.

Arguments regarding technological discrimination

Industry executives have characterized the move as discriminatory against modern financial technology. Miles Jennings, head of policy and general counsel for a16z Crypto, stated that there is no comparable state financial transaction tax on traditional derivatives or securities in the country. He argued that the state is punishing entrepreneurs rather than embracing the cost efficiencies provided by blockchain infrastructure.

The CCI further compared the new tax to penalizing communication methods based on their medium. "Taxing a transaction based on the medium through which it happens to occur on a blockchain is akin to taxing correspondence because it is delivered by email rather than by post," — Crypto Council for Innovation. The state plans to use this measure as part of a larger package intended to generate over $800 million in new revenue to close existing budget gaps.

The legislation will also mandate that digital asset brokers operating within Illinois register with the state and comply with specific reporting obligations starting January 1, 2027. This marks a significant shift in how the state intends to oversee and monetize the growing digital economy.

FAQ

What is the new Illinois tax on cryptocurrency?
Illinois has introduced a 0.2% privilege tax on digital asset transactions for residents conducted on registered platforms. The measure applies to all transactions involving residents under the category of digital asset business activity and takes effect in early 2027.
Why is the cryptocurrency industry opposing this tax?
Industry groups like the Crypto Council for Innovation argue the tax disproportionately burdens residents regardless of income. They claim it discriminates against blockchain technology by not applying similar fees to traditional securities like stocks or bonds, potentially forcing companies to relocate.
Telegram

Fresh news on our Telegram

Get instant alerts for new posts in «Money»

@promoneyandevenmore